Subject: Re: multiple copies of arp_lock_try()
To: enami tsugutomo <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/24/2002 16:26:54
>> if the only difference is the lack of target hardware address, does the
>> following diff look sane? i really need an environment to test it...
>Trailing junk will be sent unless we fixup the length of packet in
>arprequest(), won't it?
correct. i've corrected it locally, as well as input side
(when ar_hrd is not set by the sender, as well as length validation).