Subject: Re: multiple copies of arp_lock_try()
To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <>
From: enami tsugutomo <>
List: tech-net
Date: 06/24/2002 16:11:42
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <> writes:

> 	if the only difference is the lack of target hardware address, does the
> 	following diff look sane?  i really need an environment to test it...

Trailing junk will be sent unless we fixup the length of packet in
arprequest(), won't it?