Subject: Re: more GRE changes
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jasper Wallace <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/10/2002 16:00:54
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 email@example.com wrote:
> > pls take a look at 17202 - if we apply this patch, we can depart from
> > "inner address used for outer" model to "completely separate inner/
> > outer address" model. do people object about the change? i understand
> > there are backward compatibility concerns, and would like to know
> > how people are using gre interface currently.
> to clarify -
> if people are using like this, we are okay to pull this change in.
> # ifconfig gre0 A B
> # greconfig -i gre0 -s C -d D
> (now 2nd command should be "ifconfig gre0 tunnel C D")
Thats what i've used everywhere i've used it (6 machines or so).
I also agree with your comment in the commit logs that configuring the outer
addresses after the innner ones is counter intuative.
Information wants to be a lumberjack.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----