Subject: Re: Proposed NetBSD DHCP Vendor Class Identifier
To: Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de>
From: Jason R Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/22/2002 09:49:40
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 03:48:37PM +0100, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> _If_ I write a real ROM bootloader for the cesfic one day, I'll
> probably use libsa.
Ok, no problem. We could always add a CPP macro to set the Requester
field in libsa.
> This wouldn't be PXE, but see below...
...right, neither is what I am proposing PXE.
> In environments where PXE is not available, the "filename" field
> or eg some locally defined BOOTP option field could be used for
> conditional behaviour.
> The strings should look the same as far as possible to avoid
What I am proposing really has nothing to do with PXE. I'm proposing
NetBSD "vendor" options, not PXE vendor options...
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>