Subject: Re: dhcpd(8) & Sockets API
To: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
From: Jim Wise <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/07/2002 13:58:54
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Todd Vierling wrote:
>Note that dhcpd *does* open a socket on port 68, bound to all interfaces,
>for the purpose of direct communication and fallback. So it's possible that
>either (1) we have a bug in packet processing somewhere, or (2) the original
>poster didn't have ipf set Correctly for testing (maybe just a simple
>This "bug" needs much more analysis before coming to conclusions about how
>to "fix" it.
Several people have reviewed the ipf config used here, and several
people have reproduced the problem with their own ipf configs.
I am not currently in a position to judge whether this is a dhcpd bug or
something else. It _is_ occuring, and as Michael Richardson (who has
also reproduced the problem) has pointed out, it's _not_ acceptable.
If bpf is not listening on that interface, we need to determine how nmap
is getting a response from the host, and how the ipf rule governing port
68 is not getting hit (as ipfstat confirms).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----