Subject: Re: Patch for timiting TCP MSS (i.e. for new PPPoE)
To: Michael Graff <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Darren Reed <email@example.com>
Date: 12/06/2001 07:41:15
In some email I received from Michael Graff, sie wrote:
> Not to ask the obvious question, but isn't the author of ipfilter a
> NetBSD developer? I may be wrong, but I thought maintaining ipfilter
> was why he was given developer access in the first place...
> Or am I totally confused here?
I forget but maybe I was and then someone else decided they knew how
ipfilter should be installed in netbsd and I didn't and that resulted
in a spat of sorts.
> Rick Byers <rb-netbsd@BigScaryChildren.net> writes:
> > Is there some reason (other than no-one has stepped forward to do it),
> > that NetBSD-current hasn't been tracking ipfilter releases? Atleast that
> > way we'd never get horribly out of date (new releases would have an
> > up-to-date ipfilter), and we'd have less work to do to pull up patches to
> > -release branches. As it stands right now, -current is using an ipfilter
> > thats almost a year old.
> > If its simply that no-one has volunteered to do the work, then I will
> > volunteer to take a stab at it and submit patches.
People hate it being upgraded because it means they have to compile the
various programs (ipf, ipnat, ipfstat, ipmon) and install them at the
same time as the kernel. Given that generally these change too, it
should be no big deal but for whatever reason, it would seem quite a
few people (mostly developers) run ipfilter enabled kernels that are
much more recent than their corresponding userland. So in short, nobody
(except end users, it seems) wants it updated that often and then the time
lag involved in the person maintaining it getting around to it often ends
up with me saying "no wait for the next rev" (for good reason) and we
go back to the start, again.