Subject: Re: connection comes in fxp0 but response goes out fxp1 help?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Michael Richardson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/12/2001 22:24:50
>>>>> "sudog" == sudog <email@example.com> writes:
sudog> You should cc: this to the list so a recent message is in the
sudog> archives. I saw some brief info dated ages ago that talked about
sudog> per-interface default routes. is there any reason why this hasn't been
sudog> committed? Should I ask tech-net?
Paul Vixie did them.
The syn cookie changes the structure so that those patches do not work.
Doing it again isn't hard, I just never took the time since testing it
requires a bit of effort in the setup department.
sudog> On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 11:47:25 -0400
>> From: Michael Richardson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> To: email@example.com
>> Subject: Re: connection comes in fxp0 but response goes out fxp1 help?
>> It sounds like you need per-interface default routes.
>> There is some code on ftp.vix.com, but that doesn't work on post 1.4.
>> I keep trying to hack it back into shape, but keep running out of time.
>> ] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
>> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
>> ] firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
>> ] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [