Subject: Re: better ARP handling in IPv4 alias address
To: Andrew Brown <email@example.com>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/04/2001 09:59:38
>which is suboptimal, since i need the 206 address to be the "primary",
>and i've lost one of the aliases. i guess i could just "assume" that
>the address being replaced is at the head...but i still think there
>ought to be a way to insert at the head.
what i meant was that we should try to remove the special
treatment of "primary". it needs time, but it should happen.