Subject: Re: better ARP handling in IPv4 alias address
To: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Andrew Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/03/2001 12:12:47
> > do people think it worthwhile to bring this in? basically, this
> > changes behavior of ARP logic against IPv4 alias addresses (non-first
> > address).
> > http://www.NetBSD.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=13311
>I.e. makes them act like first-class addresses? If so, I'm all for
first class, with cards that recline and become beds. i wonder why it
wasn't always like this...and that one had to add explicit routes for
your own addresses.
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
email@example.com * "ah! i see you have the internet
firstname.lastname@example.org (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
email@example.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."