Subject: Re: PPPoE vs ETHERMTU
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <>
List: tech-net
Date: 07/01/2001 11:22:43
>I find this implausible because the top four points would be the same
>if I were using the provider-provided software on Wintel - and anything
>that broke mail fetching for that crowd would be fixed approximately
>instantly.  (However, the provider's mailhost *does* appear to be
>trying to do PMTU-D; the packets I do see have DF set.)

	what kind of MSS value does GatesOS box uses?