Subject: Re: Conditionalize expensive BPF operation
To: Martin Husemann <email@example.com>
From: Jason R Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/30/2001 13:46:14
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 10:40:36PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > I don't think you need to do this. Checking ifp->if_bpf != NULL should
> > be sufficient.
> Oh, of course, if that is acceptable (I usually avoid touching opaque things,
> even for simple tests like this, without a macro or function keeping the
> abstraction sane).
Well, that's the test that everything else currently uses... *shrug* :-)
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>