Subject: Re: IPv6 capable tun
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael Richardson <email@example.com>
Date: 01/08/2001 09:19:37
>>>>> "itojun" == itojun <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
itojun> I've checked the PR. i'm not sure if it is right to peep
itojun> L3 header...
1) if peeing the header is the right thing to do, is this the right way to
2) tun0 seems to assume that things were IPv4. Why would assuming IP be any
worse than what we had before?
I realize that many people want a more general tunnel device.
] Train travel features AC outlets with no take-off restrictions|gigabit is no[
] Michael Richardson, Solidum Systems Oh where, oh where has|problem with[
] email@example.com www.solidum.com the little fishy gone?|PAX.port 1100[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [