Subject: Re: Multicast routing and unnumbered point-to-point interfaces
To: Hitoshi Asaeda <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 10/06/2000 10:13:32
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 02:09:23AM +0900, Hitoshi Asaeda wrote:
> Yes, I know the meaning of "O".:) But I think you don't need to change
> the name to make it be obvious.
> (If you do so, mrouted and pimd must be changed. If adding "O" is so
> reasonable, of course, I can agree to change from VIFF_... to
> OVIFF_... and these daemon codes. However, I cannot understand the
> Is it not enough for you only to put a comment, "obsoleted"?
It is also the intent to cause old source to fail to compile with the
new kernel headers.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>