Subject: Re: arp problem
To: Eric Haszlakiewicz <email@example.com>
From: Andrei Petrov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/28/2000 10:05:46
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 05:31:28PM -0700, Andrei Petrov wrote:
> > Thank you for help, yep kernel assumes and use longword alignment,
> > and arp doesn't. Seems that ROUNDUP is popular in net*.
> > I submitted patch for this into problem report.
> just about what I have. In addition to using ROUNDUP I am also
> going to use the length field instead of sizeof since one of those addresses
> is actually only 8 bytes long. This will also allow better bounds checking
> in the kernel.
> The kernel will now return EINVAL unless it finds exactly the number of
> addresses you say you're giving it and the amount of data you pass is exactly
> the same as the sum of the sa_len fields.
> Could you please update to arp.c:1.25 and rtsock.c:1.42 and make sure
> I didn't break anything?
What worked before works as before. The test is around publishing
entry. New arp works.
Old arp rejected with EINVAL, that's good; my modified is rejected and I