Subject: Re: Reserved port range patches
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 08/26/2000 20:11:06
>>> > did you check the names ?
>>> Yes. FreeBSD's naming scheme is already different from ours - what they
>>> call "net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst" is "net.inet.ip.anonportmin". So
>>> I named the variables to match our existing variables.
>>Oh, ok. No problems, then.
> i believe we should check sys/netinet/in_pcb.c:in_baddynamic() too.
> it is more flexible than just having range of port.
oops, the above is in openbsd.