Subject: Re: Local IP addresses changing
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: Wolfgang Rupprecht <wolfgang@wsrcc.com>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/25/2000 11:24:07
> 1. NTP should get intimate enough with the BIND DNS code to get the
> TTL along with the A RR, and should requery the name/address mapping
> for all peers when their TTLs expire. The TTL is the maximum time that
> such a mapping is guaranteed to be valid. This necessarily means that
> NTP should be keeping peering relationships with host names rather
> than host addresses...

I wonder if it wouldn't be easier to have a unique ntp-peer identifier
in the ntp packet itself and ignore the IP address for identification
purposes.  

Ntp already adds state inside the packet for authentication.  It
wouldn't be that much of a leap to just put the hostname (or an
md5-hash or similar) inside the packet.

-wolfgang
-- 
       Wolfgang Rupprecht <wolfgang+gnus@dailyplanet.wsrcc.com>
		    http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
Coming soon: GPS mapping tools for Open Systems. http://www.gnomad-mapping.com/