Subject: Re: bpf performance suckage
To: Darren Reed <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/20/2000 16:19:06
>The idea is if a mbuf pointer is passed (i.e. buflen == 0) as the buffer,
>BPF knows it has a buffer of size "buflen" it can do an easy check with.
now I see what you mean. sorry, I was confused.
>If an mbuf has been passed (buflen == 0), but BPF says what we want is in
>the next mbuf, then m won't be NULL so it will go the long way though and
>call m_*word() to get the data.
>I suppose I can send you bpf_filter.c anyway and see if it
>works/crashes ? :-)
please send me those.