Subject: Re: question: forcing IPV6 traffic down a IPV6/IPV4 tunnel
To: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.OZ.AU>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 03/11/2000 19:21:36
>That's better than using a global address. But using the interface
>name is easier to manage and simpler. Note that kernel interface
>doesn't have to have a way to pass around interface names, there's
>no reason why the route command given something like
> route add default -int gif0
>can't go find what address is associated with gif0 and pass that in
>as the default route destinatin (using the link-local addr if
>appropriate, so it is immune to global addressing changes, and there
>doesn't need to be a processes sitting watching for renumber events).
this is basically what we can do when we tweak route_output().