Subject: re: ancillary data alignment and binary backward compatibility: please pick one
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/29/2000 21:41:48
> well, it *should*. note that it goes through an emulation layer
> and we're gonna need to special case a Lot of ioctl's here for this
> to work sanely (or, push part of this support out of compat/netbsd32).
> this emulation layer isn't quite finished yet though eduardo has done
> a large amount of work to make it so, at least for sparc64 (where it
> is essential!)
Right, well, also note that we're still running sparc64 systems in ILP32
mode because of compiler lossage, right?
pretty much. gcc 2.95* has mostly usable sparc64 support, FWIW.