Subject: Re: ancillary data alignment and binary backward compatibility: please pick one
To: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 02/28/2000 10:05:23
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:07:58 +1100
matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> well, it *should*. note that it goes through an emulation layer
> and we're gonna need to special case a Lot of ioctl's here for this
> to work sanely (or, push part of this support out of compat/netbsd32).
> this emulation layer isn't quite finished yet though eduardo has done
> a large amount of work to make it so, at least for sparc64 (where it
> is essential!)
Right, well, also note that we're still running sparc64 systems in ILP32
mode because of compiler lossage, right?
-- Jason R. Thorpe <email@example.com>