Subject: Re: ancillary data alignment and binary backward compatibility: please pick one
To: None <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/28/2000 21:42:37
> I personally vote for the latter, since the former will break if we
> try to run 32bit sparc binary on 64bit sparc kernel.
> However, I'm still not sure if it is okay to make CMSG_xx non-constant.
additional question: are sizeof(long) different on sparc32 and sparc64?
if so, routing socket alignment (ROUNDUP in sys/net/rtsock.c will
have the similar problem.