Subject: Re: ancillary data alignment and binary backward compatibility: please pick one
To: None <>
From: None <>
List: tech-net
Date: 02/28/2000 21:42:37
>	I personally vote for the latter, since the former will break if we
>	try to run 32bit sparc binary on 64bit sparc kernel.
>	However, I'm still not sure if it is okay to make CMSG_xx non-constant.

	additional question: are sizeof(long) different on sparc32 and sparc64?
	if so, routing socket alignment (ROUNDUP in sys/net/rtsock.c will
	have the similar problem.