>> This change is so simple why are you fighting it?
>
>because it would look like this:
>
>struct foo {
>	struct sockaddr *sa1;
>	struct sockaddr *sm1;
>	struct sockaddr *sa2;
>	struct sockaddr *sm2;
>	struct in_addr a4_1;
>	struct in6_addr a6_1;
>	struct in_addr m4_1;
>	struct in6_addr m6_1;
>	struct in_addr a4_2;
>	struct in6_addr a6_2;
>	struct in_addr m4_2;
>	struct in6_addr m6_2;
>};

since you wouldn't be mixing ipv4 stuff with ipv6 stuff in the same
rule (would you?), i'd imagine you could do away with some of the
grotesqueness by unioning most of this.  no?

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."