Subject: Re: revised ethernet/802.xx input header processing.
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christoph Badura <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/01/1999 02:03:41
email@example.com (Bill Sommerfeld) writes:
>> Yes! Having the caller adjust the mbuf defeats the entire purpose
>> of the changes I made earlier that cause the hardware drivers to not
>> adjust the mbuf :-)
>This is for PPPoE support, right? (you need access to the mac level
>src/destination addresses there, right?)
Note that the token ring code already passes up un-adjusted mbufs because
the if_tokensubr.c stuff needs to get at the source routing info at the
start of the frames.
Christoph Badura www.netbsd.org
Anything that can be done in O(N) can be done in O(N^2).
-- Ralf Schuettau (after looking at a particular piece of code)