Subject: Re: revised ethernet/802.xx input header processing.
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: Christoph Badura <bad@oreilly.de>
List: tech-net
Date: 11/01/1999 02:03:41
sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld) writes:
>> Yes!  Having the caller adjust the mbuf defeats the entire purpose
>> of the changes I made earlier that cause the hardware drivers to not
>> adjust the mbuf :-)

>This is for PPPoE support, right?   (you need access to the mac level
>src/destination addresses there, right?)

Note that the token ring code already passes up un-adjusted mbufs because
the if_tokensubr.c stuff needs to get at the source routing info at the
start of the frames.

-- 
Christoph Badura					www.netbsd.org

	Anything that can be done in O(N) can be done in O(N^2).
	-- Ralf Schuettau (after looking at a particular piece of code)