Subject: Re: m_copy - doesn't copy if M_EXT is set.
To: Darren Reed <>
From: None <>
List: tech-net
Date: 10/04/1999 18:41:42
>So far I've received two replies from people who've added this behaviour
>in (yourself and one other) and I also require it.  Maybe there will be
>others in the future, maybe not, but surely if there's two or more uses
>for this, it has to be worth adding to the kernel ?

	I'm happy to use new flag whenever it is made available, but 
	I also fear another *BSD incompatibility...