Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc
To: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/23/1999 13:42:06
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 01:02:26PM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> While that's what netatalk does, that's not technically correct. ;-)
> net 0 is reserved for "this net". While for any routed situation, and for
> unrouted phase II we want any net 0 connections to go to the loopback
> interface (which I think will then be caught by atalkd), for unrouted
> phase 1, net 0 is the wire. :-)
As lo0 is configured with net 0, won't the kernel anserw to this for any
Otherwise we'll have a problem for multihomed hosts anyway, isn't it ?
> Also, I think someone else made a correct comment that this really should
> set the route to STARTUP_FIRSTNET, not 1.
Is this correct for both phase 1 and 2 ? I think the issue was still open ...
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr