On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 01:35:33PM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
> There's an alternate way of doing this.  Don't encode the atalk routes 
> as binary but instead use BCD.  So then you'd have routes 0x0500/0xfff0 
> and 0x0510/0xffff.
> 
> Just a thought.

Well, it still doesn't match the netatalk model, and makes the computations
needed for routing more complicated. I'm not sure it's a good idea :)

--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
--