Subject: R: arp.
To: None <>
From: andrea <>
List: tech-net
Date: 04/06/1999 12:46:23
-From: Crist J. Clark <>

>[1] The Secondary Router would not actually be doing routing in this
>case. It's acting more like a switch. You did not really tell us why
>you are doing this. Would getting a switch be a better option for you?

Tell me more about this.
What do you mean for 'switch' exactly?
Can a unix-box be configured like a switch ?