Subject: Re: host address zero - useable?
To: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
List: tech-net
Date: 03/08/1999 01:03:43
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net> writes:
    Andrew> subnet mask (ie, the interface address 206.223.36.7/25 is
    Andrew> illegal since the subnet mask is a single zero bit) unless
    Andrew> you explicitly say "ip subnet-zero"?

  Because Cisco's predate the time when things were classless and
using host/network "0" was confusing for people and systems. It is
still set that way by default because it is historical.

]    Have encryption. Am travelling... looks like Pensylvania.  |1 Fish/2 Fish[
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |Red F./Blow F[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |strong crypto[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [