Subject: Re: host address zero - useable?
To: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
List: tech-net
Date: 03/08/1999 01:03:43
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net> writes:
Andrew> subnet mask (ie, the interface address 206.223.36.7/25 is
Andrew> illegal since the subnet mask is a single zero bit) unless
Andrew> you explicitly say "ip subnet-zero"?
Because Cisco's predate the time when things were classless and
using host/network "0" was confusing for people and systems. It is
still set that way by default because it is historical.
] Have encryption. Am travelling... looks like Pensylvania. |1 Fish/2 Fish[
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |Red F./Blow F[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |strong crypto[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [