Subject: Re: NetBSD and cable modems
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Wolfgang Rupprecht <email@example.com>
Date: 01/04/1999 11:36:02
firstname.lastname@example.org (Matthias Scheler) writes:
> Which bandwidth do the modems offer? And are the acting as bridges or
> as routers?
The cable modem I have, a LanCity LCP does a claimed 10 Mbits/sec on
both the TV cable side and the ethernet side. I've personally seen
over 5Mbits/sec ftp's.
The LanCity "modem" is a filtering bridge. I wish they'd have taken
the extra effort to put in routing code. On networks like here in
Fremont California we have > 8000 machines on one bridged ether.
There is an abundance of broadcast chatter. I'm seeing >20 broadcasts
per sec during some parts of the day. Real routing code would work
wonders at quieting this crap down.
Not all cable modems are bridges. I understand cable modems like the
"*surfer" product from Motorola are real routers. (Although they use
different modulation techniques and are quite a bit slower.)
In regard to the original posters question about SMC de* TULIP cards
and overruns, I don't see any when talking to the cable modem. The
only overruns I ever see is when I'm doing lots of disk I/O by
saturating the Adaptec card (wide/fast) and saturating the local
100base-TX ether. Then I see the de driver shift into lower gear as
Dec 18 21:33:07 capsicum /netbsd: de1: abnormal interrupt:
transmit underflow (raising TX threshold to 96|256)
Nov 28 20:46:19 capsicum /netbsd: de1: abnormal interrupt:
transmit underflow (raising TX threshold to 128|512)
Wolfgang Rupprecht <email@example.com>