Subject: Re: erroneous ack packet, ideas please?
To: Michael Richardson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Andrew Brown <email@example.com>
Date: 07/17/1997 15:35:49
> It depends on how much information you want to tell the user, but it
>would be nice to be able to specify which kind of denied you want to
exactly my thinking...
> The advantage of port unreachable is that it makes it the same as if
>you didn't have that service enabled.
yep. but since i "foresaw" other "requirements" i left that part sort
of open in my ioctl code. currently it has a switch handling 0, which
means "accept the connection", and the default case sends (will send)
the reset packet. it would be trivial to add more cases...
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
firstname.lastname@example.org (TheMan) * "ah! i see you have the internet
email@example.com that goes *ping*!"
firstname.lastname@example.org * "information is power -- share the wealth."