Subject: Re: Your proposed changes to route flush/route flushall
To: Bill Sommerfeld <email@example.com>
From: Jim Rees <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/20/1997 11:55:09
I'm certainly open to suggestions. This was one of those one-hour hacks I
had to make to get my machine usable for a trip, and wasn't very well
thought out. I agree that your solution number 3 is best.
- I can understand why you want to take out RTM_LLINFO routes, but
why RTM_STATIC? Do you have any routes which are RTM_STATIC but which
*aren't* also RTM_GATEWAY or RTM_LLINFO?
I don't remember, but is there any reason not to flush these?