Subject: Re: Q's from localtalk efforts
To: None <tech-net@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Guenther Grau <email@example.com>
Date: 02/18/1997 16:07:11
der Mouse wrote:
> The last, I think. I've rewritten much of the tun driver, and among
> other things made it capable of handling multiple address families.
> Only a little of this has made it back into the tree, probably largely
> because I did a special device with a text interface rather than a slew
> of new ioctl()s as the interface to frobbing options.
> Perhaps I should just sit down with -current's tun driver and put in
> some of the things it more desperately needs, like address family
> tagging and address prepending.
Hmm, why not just add this slew of ioctl()s and get this stuff into
the tree? Or just convince the others of the beauty of your text
interface and get your version into the tree :-)