tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: hardclock(9) could go.

To: "Mathew, Cherry G.*" <c%bow.st@localhost>
Subject: Re: hardclock(9) could go.
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:42:59 +0100

On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 05:32:10AM +0000, Mathew, Cherry G.* wrote:
> I look forward to your comments and test results, if any.

I think moving heartbeat() to a callout context voids it's purpose.

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: hardclock(9) could go.
  - From: Mathew, Cherry G.*

References:
- hardclock(9) could go.
  - From: Mathew, Cherry G.*

Prev by Date: hardclock(9) could go.
Next by Date: Re: Fullfs file system
Previous by Thread: hardclock(9) could go.
Next by Thread: Re: hardclock(9) could go.
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index