Re: flock(2): locking against itself?

[Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>]

>> Another option is to use newterm() in curses with a funopen()ed
>> stream for output which queues the output to be written
>> (nonblockingly) to the real stdout.
> Would toggling O_NONBLOCK using fcntl() work for you?  A bit tedious,
> but it can be done "per operation".

...ish.  I hadn't thought of that.  But, the way the code is
structured, that actually isn't a crazy suggestion at all.

I'm not sure it would work, but it's a very good thought.

Thank you!

					Mouse