Re: ZFS: time to drop Big Scary Warning

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <rmiv99ihuqd.fsf%s1.lexort.com@localhost>,
Greg Troxel  <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>which is also similar, but slightly different.
>
>So overal I conclude that there's nothing terrible going on, and that
>these results are in the same class of mostly passing but somewhat
>irregular as the base case.  So work to do, but it doesn't support "ZFS
>is scary".
>
>(Of course, the system stayed up through the tests and has no apparent
>trouble, or I would have said.)
>
>As an aside, it would be nice if atf-test used TMPDIR or had an argument
>to say what place to do tests.

That's a good test, but how does zfs compare in for the same test with lets
say ffs or ext2fs (filesystems that offer persistence)?

Best,

christos