Re: pg_jobc going negative?

[mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)]

max%m00nbsd.net@localhost (Maxime Villard) writes:

>You can see they are all different, but all have to do with reading the
>group pointer, which was either freed, overwritten, not initialized,
>unmapped, or contained pure garbage. This is typical of refcounting bugs
>where a resource disappears under your feet.

pg_jobc is not a reference counter. The assertion probably stopped
a bug in a different place by coincidence.

-- 
-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."