Re: KAUTH_SYSTEM_UNENCRYPTED_SWAP

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> writes:

> Is it possible to avoid negation in the name?
>
> KAUTH_SYSTEM_ENABLE_SWAP_ENCRYPTION

I think the point is to have one permission to enable it, which is
perhaps just regular root, and another to disable it if securelevel is
elevated.

So perhaps there should be two names, one to enable, one to disable.