On 06.06.2019 17:10, Christos Zoulas wrote: > It is better style to do avoid the extra checks and duplication so I would > also fix the original :-). > > Having said all of that, I don't see any of those changes are "risky" or > creating issues for the -9 branch, so I don't see a reason to delay them. > > christos > I wanted to check it first with GDB, LLDB, EDB and through ATF tests on multiple setups (xen, i386, amd64, guest of haxm/xen/nvmm/etc, amd, intel...). However if you feel confident we can commit it sooner and in case of trouble redefine it before 9.0.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature