tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Implement PT_GETXSTATE and PT_SETXSTATE

On 06.06.2019 17:10, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> It is better style to do avoid the extra checks and duplication so I would
> also fix the original :-).
> Having said all of that, I don't see any of those changes are "risky" or
> creating issues for the -9 branch, so I don't see a reason to delay them.
> christos

I wanted to check it first with GDB, LLDB, EDB and through ATF tests on
multiple setups (xen, i386, amd64, guest of haxm/xen/nvmm/etc, amd,
intel...). However if you feel confident we can commit it sooner and in
case of trouble redefine it before 9.0.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index