Re: svr4, again

[Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>]

> On Dec 20, 2018, at 12:29 PM, Maxime Villard <max%m00nbsd.net@localhost> wrote:

> So, first things first, and to come back to my email about ibcs2: what are
> the reasons for keeping it? As I said previously, this is not for x86 but
> for Vax. As was also said, FreeBSD removed it just a few days ago.
> 
> I'm bringing up compat_ibcs2 because I did start a thread on port-vax@ about
> it last year (as quoted earlier), and back then it seemed that no one knew
> what was the use case on Vax.


It seems reasonable to remove COMPAT_IBCS2, for the same reasons as COMPAT_SVR4.

-- thorpej