Re: Too many PMC implementations

To: Anders Magnusson <ragge%ludd.ltu.se@localhost>
Subject: Re: Too many PMC implementations
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:17:29 -0700

> On Aug 23, 2018, at 8:47 AM, Anders Magnusson <ragge%ludd.ltu.se@localhost> wrote:

> I have used it not long ago for vax.  Maybe I did have to do some tweaks, do not remember,
> but I really want to be able to use kernel profiling on vax.
> 
> So, I really oppose removing it and leaving vax without any kernel profiling choice.

How hard would it be to add support for dtrace on Vax?

-- thorpej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon

References:
- Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Anders Magnusson
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: Too many PMC implementations
  - From: Anders Magnusson

Prev by Date: Re: Too many PMC implementations
Next by Date: Re: Too many PMC implementations
Previous by Thread: Re: Too many PMC implementations
Next by Thread: Re: Too many PMC implementations
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index