Re: More i2c auto configuration improvements

[Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost>]

BTW, why do you use

	return (0);

in some of the drivers, while others use

	return 0;

?

Shouldn't we standardise on one or the other?

Sorry, just nit-picking - the actual changes look pretty much ok to me.



On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Jason Thorpe wrote:

> I’ve gone through all of the i2c drivers I can find in the source
> tree and audited their auto configuration scheme.  Each of the drivers
> has been updated to return the "match quality" values introduced in
> the previous set of changes.  To review, those "match quality" values
> are:

<snip>


+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+
| Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:          |
| (Retired)        | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com   |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot org |
+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+