Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config

To: Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 09:21:09 -0700

On Jun 5, 2018, at 6:05 AM, Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost> wrote:

Anyway, I haven’t even compiled this patch yet, but at least you’ll get the idea…

Indeed, there was a typo in it, but the rest of it stands :-)

-- thorpej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Jason Thorpe

References:
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Brad Spencer
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
  - From: Jason Thorpe

Prev by Date: Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
Next by Date: Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
Previous by Thread: Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
Next by Thread: Re: i2c and indirect vs. direct config
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index