Re: Deadlock on fragmented memory?

To: tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Deadlock on fragmented memory?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:18:33 +0200

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:49:01AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Most applications would never bother, but the ones that do a lot of
> running of other processes (say, sh, and probably make) could make use
> of this and cut down on a lot of both data copying and page contention.

For sh and make it would also be nice to use posix_spawn for at least
the simple cases. That saves a lot of pmap manipulations...

Joerg

References:
- Re: Deadlock on fragmented memory?
  - From: Taylor R Campbell
- Re: Deadlock on fragmented memory?
  - From: Robert Elz

Prev by Date: Re: hand over arg/env pages on exec (was: Deadlock on fragmented memory?)
Next by Date: Proposed changes for PR kern/52639 - kernhist(9)
Previous by Thread: Re: hand over arg/env pages on exec (was: Deadlock on fragmented memory?)
Next by Thread: Re: Deadlock on fragmented memory?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index