Re: Tickless kernel

To: maya%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Tickless kernel
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:36:49 +0000

On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 02:03:32AM +0000, maya%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:
 > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 11:10:19PM -0000, Michael van Elst wrote:
 > > it needs MD support on all platforms.
 > 
 > What more does an implementation need besides asking for an interrupt in
 > timo at cv_timedwait* (and increasing HZ)?

Removal of HZ...

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
  - From: John Nemeth
- Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
  - From: Johnny Billquist
- Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
  - From: Johnny Billquist
- Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Tickless kernel
  - From: maya

Prev by Date: Re: resize_ffs and ufs2
Next by Date: Re: Go on NetBSD needs love
Previous by Thread: Re: Tickless kernel
Next by Thread: Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index