[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: nanosleep() for shorted than schedule slice
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 12:54:52PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > I wonder if it would make sense for nanosleep(2) to check that requested
> > sleeping time is shorter than a schedule slice, and if it is, spin the
> > CPU instead of scheduling another process. Any opinion on this?
> No, that's wrong. It's also been discussed before.
How is that wrong? It was always more or less the point of nanosleep.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |