[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kpreempt_disable and lwp migration
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 11:19:59AM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> Isn't the idea of blocking with preemption enabled bogus?
> So instead of disallowing migration with preemption disabled, KASSERT
> in all blocking primitives that preemption is enabled and fix the fallout
> at the call sites?
Is it now safe to use blocking functions under kpreempt_disable()? What
about the single processor case?
Main Index |
Thread Index |