Re: PAX mprotect and JIT

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

Ugh, quite intrusive...

>  	vm_prot_t		protection;	/* protection code */
>  	vm_prot_t		max_protection;	/* maximum protection */
> +	vm_prot_t		lim_protection;	/* limit for max_protection */

The names are not good. max and limit-of-max don't make much sense to me.
Can we rename this somehow, or at least add a big comment here making
the concept cleaner?

Martin