Re: Fixed modular kernel path and different kernels

[Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>]

> please consider lukem's proposal from a large number of years ago
> where the kernel + modules are considered a unit and are stored
> together (in a tarball?  in a subdir?  details..)

To put on my iconoclast hat for a moment, how does this differ from a
non-modular kernel, inherently bound to all its "modules"?  (Yes, I can
think of a bunch of ways too.  My point is to provoke thought and
discussion, not to just get an answer to the question asked.)

/~\ The ASCII				  Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML		mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B