Re: UVM and the NULL page

To: Eduardo Horvath <eeh%NetBSD.org@localhost>, Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>, Maxime Villard <max%m00nbsd.net@localhost>, tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost, Wolfgang Solfrank <Wolfgang%Solfrank.net@localhost>
Subject: Re: UVM and the NULL page
From: coypu%SDF.ORG@localhost
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:31:43 +0000

This wine argument is mostly hypothetical. It can run plenty of programs
with the disable in place. I know because I've used it since the change.

See the following:
http://web.archive.org/web/20150324113601/http://wiki.winehq.org/PreloaderPageZeroProblem

On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 09:22:29PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> ISTR that wine is actually mapping 'everywhere' in order to ensure
> the addresses it needs later can be made available by unmapping
> specific ranges.

References:
- UVM and the NULL page
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: UVM and the NULL page
  - From: Pierre Pronchery
- Re: UVM and the NULL page
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: UVM and the NULL page
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: UVM and the NULL page
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: UVM and the NULL page
  - From: Wolfgang Solfrank
- Re: UVM and the NULL page
  - From: Maxime Villard
- Re: UVM and the NULL page
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: UVM and the NULL page
  - From: Eduardo Horvath
- Re: UVM and the NULL page
  - From: David Laight

Prev by Date: Re: UVM and the NULL page
Next by Date: Re: UVM and the NULL page
Previous by Thread: Re: UVM and the NULL page
Next by Thread: Re: UVM and the NULL page
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index