Re: spkr vs spkr_synth module

[christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

On Dec 12,  6:01pm, paul%whooppee.com@localhost (Paul Goyette) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: spkr vs spkr_synth module

| You already did this, right?

Yes.

| > Why does speaker_attach_mi exists? when autoconf calls spkrattach in
| > the spkr_sync case, the parent is audio0...
| >
| > Also the wskbd code can just check that bell != NULL and call the bell
| > stuff else do the normal thing, only in the bell function and nothing else
| > needs to change...
| >
| > Or am I missing something?
| 
| Nat, can you respond to these?

I want to make spkr more of a regular device too? Why not allow multiple
spkrs and have only the first one attach to wscons?

christos